Retraction Interaction

During my graduate studies, I've come to appreciate that there are several problematic areas of scientific research and academia. The peer-review process, the cyclic nature of funding begetting publishing begetting more funding, sexism and racism within STEM fields, p-value fishing, and more recently, retractions.

Several articles in the past few months have delved into the rise in retractions of scientific papers, and the varied effects it can have within the scientific community. I highly recommend Jill Neimark's piece in Aeon Magazine from December: "The Retraction Wars - Scientists seek demigod status, journals want blockbuster results, and retractions are on the rise: is science broken?" Talk about a fantastic byline, and the article truly delivers a comprehensive look at what retractions are, how they're on the rise, and why they're both necessary and detrimental to scientific advancement. But what are they?


Neimark gives a very satisfying definition of a retraction [emphasis mine]:
The edifice upon which science is built is self-correct. And self-correction generally works. Scientists make mistakes, and science corrects those mistakes. This happens when results cannot be reproduced, and the original work is found in error. An erratum is issued when errors are relatively minor, and do not invalidate the basic assumptions and conclusions of the study as a whole. A retraction is issued when the study is no longer valid. A retraction withdraws, refutes, or reverses the entire scientific finding. 

In October, Nature reported on the rise of retractions - despite the number of publications increasing over 40% in the last ten years, retractions have increased ten-fold. 44% of those retractions are from instances of scientific misconduct, such as data fabrication or plagiarism. These results were derived from Web of Science and PubMed notices - both major journal databases that researchers often use to find scholarly articles. There isn't a reliable database that tracks retractions, instead, you must search through databases like Web of Science for retractions or look-out for retractions from individual journals. Or, you can follow blogs like Retraction Watch, which mainly report on retractions within life sciences research.


Why commit misconduct?

There are several reasons for scientific misconduct to occur, but it mainly stems from the need for scientists to publish in peer-reviewed journals. Publish or perish, as the phrase goes. Doctorate students need publications for their dissertation, post-docs are expected to publish to keep their jobs, and major researchers require publications in big-name journals in order to maintain their posts and status, as well as receive grants.

But when peer-reviewed journals operate as a business that need to maintain prestige and impact factor (the measure of how important an article published within a journal is), journals cannot afford to publish every single study that gets submitted. Even open-access, online-only journals such as those in the PLoS publishing family will curate admissions to their publication standards. There is also a bias among scientific journals to only publish significant and novel studies - if your experiment yielded insignificant results or is a repeat of a previous study with supporting results, it is unlikely that it will be published. This, in addition to the time required to peer-review articles, adds to a mentality of competition among scientists for publication. This in turn leads to errors, data fabrication, and lack of disclosure of funding sources.


The infamous Wakefield case

This internal toxicity has effects on society, including the level of 'trust' in science. Climate change deniers, opponents of child vaccinations - all find support in both articles that make it past the scrutiny of peer-review as well as the retractions of major research. The most famous example of a retracted paper is that of Andrew Wakefield's research on MMR vaccinations and autism spectrum disorder. The most famous study was published in The Lancet, the premiere journal of medical research.

Published in 1998, "Illeal lymphoid nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children" was used to support the theory that an MMR vaccination can induce autism in children. Heralded as an advancement in medicine in the late 1950's, vaccinations turned into a sort of boogieman for concerned yet misinformed parents (and still are to this day). British journalist Brian Deer is credited for taking down Wakefield, as he investigated the study and reported his findings throughout the mid-2000's. This came to a head with a General Medical Council panel on the conduct of then Dr. Wakefield. Wakefield was discredited and stripped of his UK medical license. The study was retracted from The Lancet shortly after, plenty of time for the study's bogus results to permeate public discourse.

via Skeptoid

Since then, Wakefield has been a martyr to the anti-vaccination cause; when you Google "Andrew Wakefield," half of the hits returned are from anti-vaccination and conspiracy blogs. Despite the fact that his study and entire career was discredited and proven to be falsified, his work is still used as scientific support within certain circles. The routine retraction was intended stop misinformation from spreading, but instead lends an air of conspiracy to the idea that vaccinations are unsafe or a huge pharmaceutical scam.


The repercussions of retractions

The work of Andrew Wakefield is one example of scientific misconduct and subsequent retraction. More recent cases include those of Haruko Obokata, a stem-cell researcher who has been in the news of late about fabricated data in her latest study. Obokata and co-authors claimed to be able to induce pluripotency of cells with a mild acid bath, thus 'creating' stem cells. Stem cells are used in a variety of medical studies and are being considered for therapeutic treatment of several human degenerative conditions, but they are expensive to source and embryonic sources raise ethical concerns. This would be a major breakthrough for stem cell research - unfortunately, it was too good to be true.

Replication in the lab was impossible, and investigations into the work found duplicative publications and misleading figure captions. Nature, who had published the work and an accompanying study in January 2014, swiftly retracted both papers seven months later. This case of retraction is tainted by tragedy. A month following the retraction, supervisor and co-author Yoshiki Sasai was found dead in his lab. He had killed himself. While he had been cleared of scientific misconduct, Obokata was Sasai's protégé, and he had faced criticism regarding lack of oversight, citing in his suicide note that the media frenzy and shame was too much to bear.


Retractions in ecology

So how does my own field fare in terms of retractions? Retraction Watch mainly works in life sciences, though one search of "ecology" yielded Jesús A. Lemus, whom I'll speak on later. A search on the Web of Science using "ecology" and "retraction" wasn't that useful, returning two useable articles. While figuring out the perfect search algorithm in Web of Science used to be my favourite past time (lie), I decided to go with a different approach.

First, I focused on the PLoS family of publications, if only because their user interface is for more accessible than other journals (I'm looking at you, Elsevier) and they are open-access, so anyone can perform this search. If you search for "retraction," you get 101 results, though not all are retractions. I found quite a few that I consider to be within ecology or conservation biology, and they fall within different types of retractions, from honest mistakes to full-blown scientific misconduct.

Honest mistakes and unreliable data


These cannot be considered scientific misconduct, and as such the authors should not be vilified or considered untrustworthy. Often, the author will seek to find a solution to the problem, and barring a solution, will offer retraction. The internal struggle between author and editor may be a bit more complicated, but in the end, no one is really hurt or penalized.

Mann et al 2012 "Multi-scale inference of interaction rules in animal groups using Bayesian model selection" This retraction clearly states that the authors are retracting the paper. Richard Mann, lead author, explains that there was a bug in the Matlab code that ran the statistical analysis, which severely limited the sample size used in analysis. An unfortunate mistake, but an honest one. Mann intends to reassess the data, bug-free, and seek republication. And he did! So, good on you, Dr. Mann.

Kamilar and Marshack 2011 (in Biology Letters), "Variation in chimpanzee 'culture' is predicted by local ecology, not geography" This is another example of errors in the dataset.

Georgette 2012 "Predicting the Herd Immunity Threshold during an outbreak: a recursive approach" An author-initiated retraction due to a mathematical flaw regarding model assumptions
"P-values" from xkcd
Plagiarism and self-plagiarism

Liu and Xue 2012 "Functional conservation of the Drosophila gooseberry gene and its evolutionary alleles" Outside parties brought concerns to PLoS ONE editors about this data, and the original authors did not have access to the raw data. This is in addition to some self-plagiarism concerns as well as inadequate inclusion of funding bodies. Therefore, the article was retracted. While this doesn't look good on the part of the researchers, it is definitely not the worst case of self-plagiarism out there, and the comments on the retraction make it look like more of a lab dispute than complete wrongdoing.

Starkey, Smith, and Barnard 2011 "Fisheries and marine animal populations: Learning from the long-term" A case of plagiarism (a "substantial part of the text" in fact) wherein the lead author takes responsibility.

Fabricated data and other concerns

Researcher Dr. Jesús A. Lemus has racked up a total of 12 retractions so far (according to Retraction Watch) following an ethics investigation by the Spanish Superior Council of Scientific Research (CSIC). His work mainly deals with wildlife and livestock disease. In addition to allegations from CSIC of scientific misconduct, Lemus may have invented one of his co-authors on the most recently retracted paper in Environmental Research. He has had an additional four retractions in PLoS ONE.

The final example I have reads like a case of academic rivalry and/or lack of professionalism. Anders Pape Møller is a huge figure in evolutionary biology. My colleagues may recognize the name (here's something to jog your memory: the length and symmetry of tails in barn swallows). The details of the case can be read here. Essentially, fellow evolutionary biologist Jørgen Rabøl wrote an opinionated response to Møller's Oikos paper on leaf symmetry, stating that the data must be fabricated. Unsatisfied with a retraction by Oikos, Rabøl took the case to the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty. In rebuttal, Møller states that this is a case of a petty grudge and planned to sue Rabøl (there is no follow-up on the issue, and both men are still employed at their universities, so something must have been worked out in private).


Conclusion: Scrutinize all the things

Retractions are necessary to science, but you cannot ignore that if used as a weapon or fodder for news outlets, they threaten the professional and personal livelihood of authors. Instead, we need to refocus on why retractions happen in the first place. To err is human, but at what point is it an error due to chance or circumstance, or an error due to publishing pressure. And when it's scientific misconduct, the 'how' it occurs is just as important as the 'why' it occurs.

Finally, things don't seem to be so bad in ecology and conservation biology; aside from a few rotten apples, we seem to have a lower amount of retractions than say, medicine. But then I find myself asking, is that because we're just generally better at catching mistakes before publication, or do they slip past easier because our research isn't being scrutinized as closely as it should be? When the results of population studies or ecotoxicology assessments are presented to government bodies for inclusion into policy planning, we need to be sure that this is a study can withstand the scrutiny of opponents. And that means more replication and follow-up research alongside those novelty, next-generation studies that continue to grace the covers of Nature and PLoS ONE.



via Nature
And for those of you in the lab or field: if you suspect a colleague of scientific misconduct, know how to report it to the proper authorities. Aside from the somewhat lofty ideals of protecting the sanctity of science, there are the personal repercussions as well. You may want to distance yourself from the act - I didn't do anything wrong, I'll just stay quiet and things will blow over - but if and when the shit hits the fan, your work's integrity may be questioned as well. In this case, one rotten apple can sour the barrel that is your research group.
 

-Kim

--------------

If you're interested in more retraction scandal, I suggest looking into social psychologist Diederik Stapel (54 retractions so far!*), anthropologist Mart Bax, or economist Peter Nijkamp: all are relatively influential in their field, and all are Dutch...


(11.24.2015)
Update: Retraction Watch has announced (with their parent network, Center for Scientific Integrity) a partnership with the Center for Open Science to create a retraction database. At long last, they are building the foundation for one of their major goals!
*Also, poor Diederik is now up to 57.

Comments

  1. Hello, I am one of your website customers. I want to thank you for all your post and particularly this post on your website. You are doing the best job. And I wish you good luck.
    Link Building Services IndiaLink Building Services Delhi

    ReplyDelete
  2. Health Is God expects to convey the most ideal wellbeing surveys of the supplement accumulations and different wellbeing generation that range from skincare to mind, muscle, male upgrade and cerebrum wellbeing conditions. You, the client are of most extreme significance to us, and we are focused on being the entrance that maintains your sound way of life.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nutra Trials defines personal characteristics of different health products including skincare, weight loss, muscle and male enhancement. The study presented here is briefly described for reader convenience and to deliver them assurance with health standards. The best possible answers are given here regarding the selection of an ideal supplement or cream or serum that possibly remains to be safe for health and do not cause any side effects.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think this is a real great article post.Really looking forward to read more. Visit at
    Crazy Video Hub

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is a great job, I like your posts and wish you all the best. and I hope you continue this job well.
    NutraT line

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hello, I am thomus jons thank you for this informative post. That is a great job. Wish you more success.Thank you so much and for you all the best. Takes Down
    123movies

    ReplyDelete
  7. TecSmash is your ultimate source of Technology news and Make Money Online product reviews. We research and review all Tech, MMO, Biz Opp and IM products.TecSmash

    ReplyDelete
  8. Best softwares for Internet Marketers and legitimate make money online opportunities cxyrc

    ReplyDelete
  9. Income designers.com is the number one destination to find genuine make money online programs and services. Income designers

    ReplyDelete
  10. Healrun is a health news blog we provide the latest news about health, Drugs and latest Diseases and conditions. We update our users with health tips and health products reviews. If you want to know any information about health or health product (Side Effects & Benefits) Feel Free To ask HealRun Support Team.

    ReplyDelete
  11. We are here to give you a complete review on the Parallel Profit project by Steve Clayton and Aidan Booth. If you are someone from the field you would already be familiar with these two names, for those of who are new. Parallel Profits Review

    ReplyDelete

  12. Pilpedia is supplying 100 percent original and accurate information at each moment of time around our site and merchandise, and the intent is to improve the usage of good and pure health supplement. For More Info please visit Pilpedia online store.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Supplements For Fitness due to marketing professionals making people think that taking a weight loss product will magically transform their body without effort, but no supplement can compensate for poor nutrition and lack of exercise. Ideally, these .

    https://www.supplementsforfitness.com/

    ReplyDelete
  14. Trim Fit Keto had discovered connection with the food plan via his studies and ended up at John Hopkins medical middle.Charlie's seizures have been completely controlled so long as he was on the weight loss plan. The massive fulfillment of the diet prompted Charlie's father to begin the Charlie foundation. The Visit for more info : - https://360nutra.org/trim-fit-keto/

    ReplyDelete
  15. Tevida quicker boom and higher overall performance. It's miles constantly an excellent idea to discuss with your medical doctor earlier than taking any drugs.All natural male enhancement capsules include herbs. You must discover if you have any hypersensitive reactions or allergies to them before taking Visit for more Info :- https://360nutra.org/tevida/

    ReplyDelete
  16. InMotion Body Keto Flex putting off whole food companies, particularly on low carb diets, is that they're recommending putting off or proscribing the intake of nutrient-wealthy fruits and veggies. With all the sizable studies showing how beneficial these meals are to stopping numerous illnesses, along Visit for more info :- https://360nutra.org/inmotion-body-keto-flex/

    ReplyDelete
  17. AlkaTone Keto research to make sure that it's miles safe and that is has guidelines that you may abide by means of long-termThen you definately may want to invite:There are dozens of diets on the market. Why have to I select a eating regimen that is low in carbohydrates?The weight-reduction plan market is Visit for more info :- https://timesnutrition.com/alkatone-keto/

    ReplyDelete
  18. InMotionBodyKetoFlex21 bad match between your weight loss plan "character" and the weight-reduction plan you are following.Diets are like footwear - some suit a piece too huge, a few are too slim in the toe and others, to cite from Goldilocks, are simply right.A well becoming .For More Info : https://360nutra.org/inmotion-body-keto-flex/
    InMotion Body Keto Flex

    ReplyDelete
  19. Keto Flex reduction plan. I unknowingly stored turning off the switch when i used to be dieting. Understanding that many scientists, docs, specialists, and whoever else is concerned within the weight reduction Visit for more info :- https://360nutra.org/inmotion-body-keto-flex/

    ReplyDelete
  20. Tevida dietary supplements. Those objects include natural one hundred % herbal components a good way to no longer region your fitness at excessive-danger. If you need proof if the products are truely secure, then go ahead, request for a loose sample of these Visit for more Info :- https://360nutra.org/tevida/

    ReplyDelete
  21. Our vision is that people find best quality health products they need; that the health products are safe and affodable for them. Supplements Angles (https://supplementsangles.com/)

    ReplyDelete
  22. sesquipedalian term and the melodramatic changes get started to purchase burden and get veteran today. These hospitals know toughened a real fruitful development. These are hospitals that bang been greatly licenced and there are yet others in waiting for remembering from aid from the caretaker specialty hospitals? Everyone can actually good from the services that much hospitals worship as lifelong as they hump a scrutiny poverty. All age groups can be healthy to attain much services regardless of whether they are children, or youths, adults and seniors. One artefact that you may tone most the hospitals is the fact that it can be a bit richly in terms of terms. Most fill accessing the services make a kinda best http://givinghealthylife.com/

    ReplyDelete
  23. Even before savoring matter, and during chewing, spittle is poured into the rima from the salivary glands neighbour the lour jaw. Spittle moistens nutrient and the enzymes it contains commence digestion. For when it is primed to be swallowed; The seminal eat has been transformed into a diffused chunk, called bolus, and hot or cooled to the opportune temperature. Tho' it is hastening, this pioneer is in fact quite byzantine. Prototypal, the articulator pushes the bolus against the roof of the spokesperson and into the muscle-lined hollow in the backmost of the rima: the pharynx. Erstwhile the matter is in the pharynx, several activities are carried out in the space of a span of seconds to preclude activity officious with breathing. From the pharynx, the bolus now passes to the passageway, oesophagus, the conduit that connects the spokesperson to the breadbasket. The bolus not exclusive water through the gorge due to seriousness but is pushed by waves of muscular spread called activity. Eliminate during the nutrition, the passageway is kept obstructed by a chain of muscles titled a cardiac muscle that prevents the highly lsd noesis of the tummy from regurgitating into the oesophagus. As a bolus of matter passes finished the gorge, the sphincter relaxes to gaping the way to the tummy. The stomach is a collapsible strength bag fashioned to stock substance (so that it is not unremarkably necessary to eat small meals throughout the day), mix matter with various digestive juices and then slowly hand them into the bowel. The food is mixed when the wall of the breadbasket contracts and relaxes and moves with waves of activity. By the
    https://supplementforhelp.com/

    ReplyDelete
  24. In today's age, it is understandable that the fill are highly obsessed active getting hacked and having the ground taken. Assume it has happened before to you, then you present bonk how overmuch thwarting it is. You module never deprivation your LoL boosting story to vanish after you bonk put in months or life of effort. If you buy boosting from the trusty and presentable booster, there is no hazard that your accounting may ever get illegal or stolen. The respectable companies wee use of diverse methods right to insure that your declare aggregation is stored real safely. Actually, in elo lift, nobody module ever see any of your info! Do you pass your atrip measure activity games on your smartphone? Mortal you downloaded games in your phone? There are ever two faces for a coin. Manoeuvrable games are those that are played in your featured or smartphones. Play with the commodity snake games, these bang evolved to be better with many real features. They are adapted to simulation advisable graphics, with bigeminal player facilities (still from incompatible places) and more. These games can be sorted to premium and freemium. Premium games ask payment for downloading the app, patch freemium ones are independent to download but they ask for realistic exchange to enter destined levels. https://seekapk.info

    ReplyDelete
  25. https://apkchip.com
    Primary and the simplest method to process your low-end smartphone execution is by profits the applications that are flowing in the backcloth before you signaling the strategy. You can use several duty cause applications for this, as excavation. Most of the Golem phones comprise umpteen applications that are of no use to an middling person. These applications can be handicapped which in recede increases the performance of your sound.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Absolute Keto of all, every usual belief that exercising reduces your milk create. As a long distance runner, there are times while i have wished that myth were bona fide!;-) Having actually operated my second one-half marathon simply 4 months after delivering, and while nursing my son exclusively, I invested half the marathon in agonizing pain because my milk had can be seen in.
    https://absoluteketo.weebly.com/
    https://www.healthdiscreet.com/absolute-keto-reviews/

    ReplyDelete
  27. The Probiotic supplement helps to balance good bacteria and in this regard, Zenith Labs Probiotic T-50 review is creating buzz. How far is the supplement reliable and worth considering, you will come to know about it here

    ReplyDelete
  28. Gaming pc paintings with others.Every other benefit is persistence which ties in with crew constructing and socializing. After all, so that it will get better at some thing you now not handiest must hold doing it however you have to have

    ReplyDelete
  29. Rx 580 plenty pace.Replay value:This is the games sturdy point. I cannot even rely how in many instances i have crushed this splendid traditional. It continues you coming returned for extra. It's far a easy sport that is simply flat

    ReplyDelete
  30. Rx 580 to understand why such investigations are uniquely effective. Research show that scholars are more likely to recognize and maintain the ideas that they have got discovered this way ". For this reason, it will become vital to have

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts